đ Pinned Down: 6 Days of Censorship
How Ocean Beach HOA Turned Thumbtacks into Weapons of Censorship
What begins with missing push pins might sound pettyâŠ
Until you see the pattern:
It isnât about posting placement â itâs about personal preference and power.
Over the past months, our community bulletin boards and sharing tables have been transformed â from open forums into tools of suppression, retaliation, and absurdity.

This isnât about office supplies. Itâs about free expression, selective enforcement, and an HOA willing to waste thousands in attorney fees to silence one member while punishing everyone else.

đ§Ÿ HOA Myth vs RealityÂ
HOA Myth:
âCivil Code §4515 only protects assembly, not flyers. Sorry, no thumbtacks for you.â
Reality Check:
So apparently, âfree assemblyâ means we can gather in the clubhouse and sing Kumbaya â but the moment someone posts a flyer, democracy collapses.
-
If bulletin boards arenât for community speech, why do they leave up their own notices and petunia dĂ©cor?
-
If 4515 doesnât cover flyers, why does the statute literally say members can âdistribute literatureâ?
-
Selective removal isnât âneutral policy.â Itâs censorship with a staple gun.
Translation:
The HOA isnât protecting the law. Theyâre protecting their monopoly on the bulletin board â one tack at a time

Day 1: Coordinated Censorship
On August 14th, I attempted to use the new boards. I supplied my own single thumbtack on each board to make it possible, and placed a single QR code, they were removed within a day, in coordination across all buildings, including the tacks:





Day 2: Window Dressing (875 Flower Basket Stunt)
On August 15th, after posting on the boards, someone removed the flier in the 875 building, along with the tacks, and there was a flower basket nailed into the bulletin board in itâs place.
A symbol of repurposing community space into decoration instead of dialogue.



In 825: The single flier and 2 tacks were also removed
In 855: The single flier was removed, but the 2 tacks remained.
They called the cops on fliers, but a whole bouquet with nails = âpermittedâ? Why? Because it was Petunias.
Enforcement here looks less like rulemaking âŠ
âŠand more like improv theater.
Day 3: Written Taunts (Building 825 & 875)
-
Flyers placed on August 16th werenât just removed â they were defaced with personal insults and taunts.
-
This shows animus, not random annoyance.




Also on August 16th, a board member was repeatedly power washing public sidewalks and creating safety issues by leaving water all over common areas without cleaning it or posting signage:

Pictured above - Aug 16, 7:39pm - puddles of water left in the 825 building elevator and walkways by the same board member who was washing chalk on public sidewalks.

Pictured above - Whatâs revealing is what they donât erase. Apparently the website URL is a threat, but âletâs fix thisâ can sit for weeks.
Day 4: Ongoing Suppression
-
On August 17th, I printed small AI generated satire cartoons and posted them with double sided scotch tape, since there were still no tacks (and the ones I provided kept being stolen).
-
Notices were again defaced with more written taunts.
-
People began to notice and discuss the constant shortage of thumbtacks.




Day 5: Let there be tacks
Suddenly tacks appeared

Day 6: Unlawful Fines, Stolen Tacks, Smear Campaign, Coordinated Censorshop
Aug 19 between 10am and 4pm in the 855 building, all thumbtacks have been removed, other than the ones holding up multiple pages of defamation against one homeowner (printed on association letterhead).
All fliers have been purged across all buildings. Nearly all thumbtacks have been removed. Ongoing removals are occurring, even small slips of paper informing you of the censorship are quickly being removed.



Importantly, the boardâs recent August 15th letter escalates the dispute needlessly by adding new threats of ~$5,000 additional fees (with no cure opportunity as required by AB 130) stacked on top of the existing nearly $10,000 in fees (already paid in protest).

This serves as a stark example of the tyrannical HOA causing members to fear speaking freely - false accusations, I never chalked a wall. In one case, I was fined for simply being caught on video entering the elevator with surfing gear and some fliers in my wagon. It also polices my activities outside of the property and refers to public sidewalks as âcommon areaâ:

By August 19th, the board is now circulating and posting letters in place of my fliers publicly blaming me, smearing my name, concealing the thumbtacks (again), and unlawfully billing me thousands in attorney fees for daring to point out these violations.
They accuse me of âdefamingâ them by falsely claiming they removed the tables because of me. Yet in the very same breath, they admit they did remove the tables âbecause of me.â Each new letter rewrites the last, creating a circus of contradictions:

Why This Matters
-
Civil Code §4515: Members of common-interest developments cannot have their rights to free expression unreasonably restricted.
-
Once the HOA provides bulletin boards, they cannot weaponize them to suppress speech they dislike.
-
Selective enforcement (my flyers removed while HOA notices remain untouched) is bad faith governance.
-
Retaliatory billing is not only unlawful but a direct attempt to chill protected speech.
The Bigger Picture
This isnât just âmissing tacks.â Itâs:
-
Consistency â Same behavior across multiple buildings.
-
Targeting â Only my materials are removed/defaced, while junk piles are tolerated.
-
Escalation â From removals â taunts â structural changes â smear campaigns (looks like election interference).
When you zoom out, the pattern is undeniable.
